Mowing is the second most expensive cultural practice associated with turf management.

Mowing is the second most expensive cultural practice associated with turf management.

• A. True
• B. False
• C. It is the most expensive
• D. It is the least expensive

Answer: (B)

The main idea here is how the costs of turf cultural practices compare. Mowing is not the second most expensive practice. Once you own a mower, the ongoing cost of mowing is mainly labor and fuel, which is relatively small per cut. In contrast, other practices typically involve recurring inputs and higher per-application costs—fertilizers and soil amendments, irrigation and water use, aeration, dethatching, overseeding, and potential renovations or reestablishment. Those activities often accumulate higher expenses over time, especially on larger areas or with higher maintenance standards. So the statement isn’t accurate; mowing is generally among the least expensive ongoing practices, not the second most expensive.

The main idea here is how the costs of turf cultural practices compare. Mowing is not the second most expensive practice. Once you own a mower, the ongoing cost of mowing is mainly labor and fuel, which is relatively small per cut. In contrast, other practices typically involve recurring inputs and higher per-application costs—fertilizers and soil amendments, irrigation and water use, aeration, dethatching, overseeding, and potential renovations or reestablishment. Those activities often accumulate higher expenses over time, especially on larger areas or with higher maintenance standards. So the statement isn’t accurate; mowing is generally among the least expensive ongoing practices, not the second most expensive.